How do you do, fellow gun owners?

While scrolling through the dashboard on tumblr, I found a link to nradoesntspeakforme.  It’s a site full of submissions of gun owners who… don’t get it.  They send pictures holding a sign that says, “I’m a gun owner who supports laws to reduce gun violence.” with their name & location.  What they’re really saying is, “See, I’m a gun owner, just like you!  But I feel that many guns are too big/powerful/scary compared to mine and they should be restricted more.” or alternatively, “Hey there, non-gun owners!  As you can see I own a gun and speak for all gun owners and even I think that we need more laws.  Don’t you agree?”

If someone disagrees with the NRA, that’s fine, it’s not mandatory to support them.  But the calls for more laws “to end gun violence” are just to dupe people into giving up their freedom.  None of the proposed laws will make anyone safer, none of them will impact criminals more than the innocent, and the only major change that will happen is responsible gun owners having more shit to put up with.  Strangely enough(but not surprisingly), some of the idiots in the pictures are from california and new York, both of which almost seem to be competing for most restrictive gun laws in the country(massachusetts, illinois, and new jersey are a few others).  To someone who appreciates guns the laws in these places are frustrating and ridiculous.  To a fudd cuck proud to be on that site, it’s not enough, and they won’t stop pushing for more.  Not only that, but they want other states to follow the terrible examples they’ve set.

The term “Fudd”(as in Elmer Fudd, the cartoon character) is used to describe someone who believes that guns only can be used for hunting and nothing else, and only certain guns can be used for it.  Now this belief might work for them, but imposing it on other gun owners is bogus.  The reason why is that guns have multiple uses, and the fact fudds only use them for hunting is no excuse to ban the rest.  Even if you never plan on target shooting, competition shooting, or having to use one in defense, why limit your possible options?  And why limit others who responsibly use them for different purposes(and might be in a rougher environment)?  Furthermore, the guns that aren’t considered “sporting enough” to hunt with?  Take the standard magazine out, slap a smaller magazine in, and lo and behold, it can hunt durr!

The term “cuck”(as in cuckold, someone who watches their spouse get fucked) gets thrown around a lot on the internet these days, but it applies well to this situation.  Compromising  rights allows politicians to fuck with said rights.  Just like with fudds hunting only mentality, some people are fine with giving up their freedom.  In fact, they get off on it and it’s all they know and want to know.  That doesn’t mean that everyone else should be required to.  It’s also apparent that not all the owners on the site are aware of what they’re doing.  “Oh, you don’t like the NRA?  You want to reduce gun violence, right?  Here hold this sign.”  They are being used as a political tool to push an antigun agenda while claiming gun ownership.  The next step would be getting them to rat out gun owners who don’t want more restrictions.

 

Storytime and rant, muh background checks edition

Several years ago I worked in commiefornia for a couple months.  One day at break time we were talking about guns and I mentioned bringing one or several of mine from out of state but not wanting to risk losing them to antifunners.  One of my coworkers says “I got a .30-06 bolt action I want to sell, you interested?”  I think it was a Marlin, almost brand new with a scope.  I didn’t have a .30-06 in my collection and it’s a common caliber, so I say sure, I’ll think about it.  Then he says, “Ok, I’ll go to the gun store and get the paperwork.  They’ll hold it for the waiting period too.”

“Hahaha good one, not even California is that shitty.” I say, thinking he’s joking.  But no, private transfers have to go through someone with a FFL(federal firearm license) in CA.  In free states, if someone wants to buy/sell/trade a gun with someone else, they can(and don’t give me any of that loophole shit, it’s illegal to sell to someone who’s not allowed to own a gun.  Straw purchases are felonies).  Background checks are optional in a private transfer as they should be.  Criminals buy and sell to each other on the black market and it’s not consistently enforceable.  Why can’t law-abiding people have a similar convenience?  Private transfers can also give the option of buying or selling a different selection than what’s at the average gun store, possibly for a better deal.  If the other person is too sketchy, don’t buy from or sell to them.

And the fucking waiting periods, ugh.  I knew CA had them but it was a shock to hear they’re required for private transfers.  Back in the free world(just less of a police state) buying a gun at the store consists of seeing the item, filling out the form, waiting while the background check is called, then paying and leaving with the new purchase right then and there.  A private transfer can be even quicker, especially if the buyer and seller know each other.  I wait while saving up money to buy guns, why should I wait again for something that’s paid for?  Because some hotheaded pieces of shit shoot their battered spouses(who would be waiting to get a gun to defend themselves under the same law)?  Keep in mind the battered spouse is less likely to survive with a blade, blunt object, or hands & feet against someone stronger.  But with a gun and some know-how, the same small, physically weaker person has a chance to stop the vicious attacks that restraining orders can’t and cops won’t get to in time.  And if someone is enraged or jealous to the point of attacking someone habitually, how would waiting an arbitrary number of days deter them?  For those without spouse/ex issues, what if there’s a major natural disaster or a riot?  Looters are on the loose, but sorry, there’s still x amount of days left on the waiting period before you can get what you already bought.

I never got that rifle, but picked up an older Remington bolt action also with scope at a pawn shop in the state of my residency.  It was brought to the range to test fire a box of ammo, which it did fine except the scope came loose and fell off.  Forgot to bring any loctite, so the last rounds were just eyeballed with the rails.  Later it was packed in a case with another rifle or shotgun or few the next time I went to CA(grandfathering them in before the fucking long gun registry was in effect, heh heh heh).

Anyway, all this relates to the hype about Obama’s plans for an executive action and the ongoing “debate” over gun control vs. gun rights.  Background checks are already required for buying a gun in any gun store or from someone with an FFL.  Pawn shops selling guns, like the one above, are also required to do this, as are big wallyworld type stores with guns in the sporting goods dept.  But every day some dipshit is on the news saying, “We need background checks, it’s too easy to get a gun.  Assault clips are scary and fast.  Common sense for the childrens!  You don’t need shoulder ghost things, etc.” without having any idea or just ignoring the fact that background checks are required and have been since 1998.  Online sales of guns require background checks too unless its something like silkroad(which happens to be illegal).  Not only that, but a gun bought online has to be shipped to FFL(or if it’s over 50 years old it might be eligible to be sent to someone with a C&R license), because guns haven’t been allowed to just be shipped anywhere since 1968 (gun control act after JFK was killed).

Idiots who watch and believe the dipshits on the news ask, “But what about background checks for private transfers?  I don’t know the difference between the black market and a gun show just like I don’t know a hunter from a poacher, they’re all totally the same, right?  It’s no fair that there isn’t a middleman.  Why not make everyone have to get a FFL because muh permit?”  Making it illegal to buy and sell without having a FFL won’t stop criminals, but it will create a nice chunk of revenue for the government to waste on more legislation.  In order to sell that you have to pay for this license first, or you can turn it in for destruction.  Keep paying to renew the license every year or else there will be more fees.

“Nobody is coming for your guns,” the antifunners say with a tear in their eye, because that’s farther down the line.  “All we’re asking for is a few more commonsense compromises.  Don’t you want to eliminate gun violence and make our communities safer?  The britbongs and ausfailians have the right idea, can’t we be like them?  Just a few more regulations, the last ones didn’t fuck everyone over enough.  You can still keep your guns, only you can’t.”  More and more until the hassle becomes so great that citizens start to give up.  Once that happens crime rates will go up and the government will try to control it by banning more things.

People have rolled over compromising the 2nd amendment, so what would stop politicians from going after the rest?  Start out by limiting rights and enforcing fees, then take them away completely.  Free speech is already on its way out.  “Hey, you have a nice house and we’re short on housing for the expanding the police army.  Mind if some chill at your place indefinitely?  If you disagree we’ll just take it by force.(3rd)”  Searches and seizures without a warrant happen regularly(4th).  Don’t even get me started on the justice system, or the “guilty until proven innocent and pay out the ass if you don’t have the right connections” system.  Government agents will be given power zealously enforce whatever they feel like at the time in order to fill quotas.  Best case scenario life will be miserable everywhere due to living in fear of criminals(now with more terrorism) and the authorities(who are increasingly criminals that get to commit crimes which are made legal), worst case cities and towns will eventually become ripe for good old fashioned genocide.  Source: world history

California is a major source of antigun evil in addition to overregulating virtually anything and everything, due to the grotesque vampires running the state and the general idiot populace.  In order to get a rifle there, I brought one from hundreds of miles away just to avoid the hassle of more paperwork and fees(and the time from buying it and entering the state was less than a waiting period).  If I were to do the same thing today, the rifle would be a scary unregistered imported weapon and I would be risking whatever penalties the lawmakers make up.  If I were to move there(perish the thought!) and bring the guns in my collection that aren’t scary high capacity assault weapons, within 60 days I would be required to register and pay fees for each one.  Fuck that.  The proposed laws will attempt to make the entire U.S. like CA and NY except even worse.

Didn’t think this image could get more relevant but it did.

 

Protip: Once guns laws get to the point of treating every gun like an NFA item, people might as well build unregistered fully auto silenced ghost gun stens with underbarrel sawed off shotguns attached.

 

 

 

 

over 1,400 words holy shit